Welcome to UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD
![]() |
Welcome to UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD by signing in or creating an account.
|
Earmarks, who did what, and how much ????
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 08 February 2012 - 07:20 PM
Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology
(1875 - 1961
#2 OFFLINE
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 09 February 2012 - 11:10 AM
Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology
(1875 - 1961
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 09 February 2012 - 08:34 PM
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 09 February 2012 - 09:01 PM
Ron
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 10 February 2012 - 08:43 AM
One example:
Any LEO's in our midst?
Do you still have the option to NOT contribute into Social Security?
We in the Private Sector don't have that option.
Alexis de Tocqueville
#7 OFFLINE
#8 OFFLINE
Posted 10 February 2012 - 12:03 PM
First, I said "LEO" specifically for a reason. I would like to know if LEO's still have the option to invest their money elsewhere.
( Please note, that I have a lot of respect for the Enforcement Arm of our Gov't. They have my full support, but that support isn't unconditional. )
Second, you can't tell me a .gov agency and its empolyees run the same risks as companies and employees in the Private sector.
Third, there should be no denying the fact that our elected officials don't have to play by the same set of rules as their employers / We The People. (Health care.... continued pay even when they are out of our employ... voting themselves pay raises, etc.)
Alexis de Tocqueville
#9 OFFLINE
Posted 10 February 2012 - 09:43 PM
Quote
I took that to mean Government employees in general and that you used LEO's as one example representing all of them.
I agree that a gov agency and its employees do not run the same risks as companies and employees in the Private sector. In the private sector they rarely if ever have to worry about being fired on a politician's whim. Nor do they have to worry about being payed less than their equivalent job in the government sector.(the federal government employees not withstanding)
Your third point about politicians I agree with.
#10 OFFLINE
Posted 11 February 2012 - 12:39 PM
Buddy Kidd, on 10 February 2012 - 09:43 PM, said:
Quote
I took that to mean Government employees in general and that you used LEO's as one example representing all of them.
I agree that a gov agency and its employees do not run the same risks as companies and employees in the Private sector. In the private sector they rarely if ever have to worry about being fired on a politician's whim. Nor do they have to worry about being payed less than their equivalent job in the government sector.(the federal government employees not withstanding)
Your third point about politicians I agree with.
In today's uncertain economic state, we all agree that our .gov isn't cutting spending while trying to further tax The People. All the while Private companies are closing down and layoffs ensue (sp?) at a much higher rate that .gov employees are loosing their jobs.
Alexis de Tocqueville
#11 OFFLINE
Posted 11 February 2012 - 07:29 PM
In today's economic state here in the State I live in, government has indeed cut spending and is finding ways to cut taxes at the same time.
I think you brush with too broad a brush.
#12 OFFLINE
Posted 12 February 2012 - 05:03 PM
The .gov isn't cutting back nearly as much as the Private sector.
Alexis de Tocqueville
#13 OFFLINE
#14 OFFLINE
Posted 12 February 2012 - 06:54 PM
You being obtuse with every exchange these days with the intent to get post count up is.... tiring.
Alexis de Tocqueville
#15 OFFLINE
Posted 12 February 2012 - 11:32 PM
#16 OFFLINE
Posted 13 February 2012 - 10:47 AM
I don't know anyone who would agree with your premise that the .gov employees are less secure in their jobs than those employees in the Private sector.
Alexis de Tocqueville
#17 OFFLINE
Posted 13 February 2012 - 06:59 PM
Center Punch, on 13 February 2012 - 10:47 AM, said:
I don't know anyone who would agree with your premise that the .gov employees are less secure in their jobs than those employees in the Private sector.
How do you measure your first statement? What kind of cutbacks are you talking about? Please be specific.
I have not said that the government employees are less secure in their jobs than those employees in the Private sector". I was correcting your inference that ALL government employees are always secure in their jobs and gave examples where that occurs.
#18 OFFLINE
Posted 13 February 2012 - 07:14 PM
Alexis de Tocqueville
#19 OFFLINE
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:09 PM
Take a look at the news footage from Greece today and over the weekend. If we don't get Obama out of the White House and replace vast numbers of legislators in Congress, you are looking at a microcosm of life in America in perhaps 2013 or 2014 and the latest. People need to wake up...no one more so than the cretins who hold elective office. Big difference between us and Greece? We are armed!
#20 OFFLINE
Posted 13 February 2012 - 09:25 PM
He knows what I was getting at wing. He's been so abtuse with people's posts.... basically doing anything it takes to get more replies in a thread... that I'm about ready to ignore him.
Alexis de Tocqueville
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

















