Jump to content







Welcome to UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD

Welcome to UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get automatic updates
  • Get your own profile and make new friends
  • Customize your experience here
Guest Message by DevFuse
 

France contemplating removing soldiers from Afghanistan


30 replies to this topic

#21 OFFLINE   Buddy Kidd

 

    Keeper of The Realm

  • Administrator
  • 27,629 posts
  • Skin: Steel Glass
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma City, OK
  • Country::
  • Time Online: 4d 17h 29m 21s
    Member No: 1
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:28 AM

Wrong again Buck. The Talaban was the government of Afganastan. At this point they have simply moved their operation from the capatal of Afganastan. That does not mean they are not still in existance. Wake up Buck, you have been wrong at every point you have brought out so far.

Posted Image

I am a free-market, pro-liberty, classical liberal.


#22 OFFLINE   buckshot

 
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:florida
  • Country::
    Member No: 202
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 08:22 AM

Buddy, the Taliban was never the official elected government of Afghanistan. Only three Arab countries in the world recognized them and only for a short period of time. Now the formally elected government is led by Karzai whom the people formally elected. Better do some reading of the history of afghanistan before you make a fool of yourself.
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to a better understanding of ourselves.
Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology
(1875 - 1961

#23 OFFLINE   Buddy Kidd

 

    Keeper of The Realm

  • Administrator
  • 27,629 posts
  • Skin: Steel Glass
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma City, OK
  • Country::
  • Time Online: 4d 17h 29m 21s
    Member No: 1
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:10 AM

Buck, the US government dealt with and negotiated with the Talaban government before we attacked Afganastan. That made them the defacto government of Afganastan. Perhaps you need to know more about Talaban and Afganastan history before you make a fool of yourself.

Posted Image

I am a free-market, pro-liberty, classical liberal.


#24 OFFLINE   buckshot

 
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:florida
  • Country::
    Member No: 202
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 09:40 AM

Buddy, after doing some research, this was the only reference to the Taliban being a legitimate government



The Taliban regime faced international scrutiny and condemnation for its policies. Only Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the U.S., Saudi Arabia and the UAE cut diplomatic ties with the Taliban.
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to a better understanding of ourselves.
Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology
(1875 - 1961

#25 OFFLINE   wing

 

    Wingman of the Realm

  • Administrator
  • 4,464 posts
  • Skin: Red
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Clinton Twp., Michigan
  • Country::
  • Time Online: 1d 3h 11m 2s
    Member No: 322
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 10:09 AM

You win by killing the Taliban Buck. Just like we did with BIN Laden, who was not hiding in BORA BORA, but with your friends in Pakistan. You don't win anything by being a coward. They win. You lose. You lose the conflict, you lose respect and you lose the ability to influence things overseas. Think not? Story this morning says that Khadafi loyalists have retaken a town in Libya. Think they are scared of your hero Obama? Think they will be influenced by diplomacy? If you do think that I'd say you are bordering on lunacy. You win by winning...not by WHINING!!! Korea and Vietnam didn't teach you a damned thing!
I am straight, white, male and conservative. Now what else can I do to piss you off today?

#26 OFFLINE   buckshot

 
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:florida
  • Country::
    Member No: 202
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 11:42 AM

Wing, back then under Bush our intelligence experts thought he was hiding in the Bora Bora area around the border of Pakistan. Under Obama we found him hiding close to a major city in Pakistan, and we killed him with no loss of our SEALS. Yes, Vietnam and Korea did teach me something, and is that the killing of over 100 thousand of our soldiers between them could have been better handled with diplomacy and negotiation. We fled Nam, and now they are one of our trading partners and South Korea is now one of our Ally's. North Korea is now a isolationist country and a minor threat to us. I don't think that using our drones and special ops forces to eliminate the leaders of the Taliban is cowardice, just the smart way to accomplish our goals.
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to a better understanding of ourselves.
Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology
(1875 - 1961

#27 OFFLINE   Buddy Kidd

 

    Keeper of The Realm

  • Administrator
  • 27,629 posts
  • Skin: Steel Glass
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma City, OK
  • Country::
  • Time Online: 4d 17h 29m 21s
    Member No: 1
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 02:27 PM

View Postbuckshot, on 24 January 2012 - 09:40 AM, said:

Buddy, after doing some research, this was the only reference to the Taliban being a legitimate government



The Taliban regime faced international scrutiny and condemnation for its policies. Only Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and the United Arab Emirates recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the U.S., Saudi Arabia and the UAE cut diplomatic ties with the Taliban.

Buck, what does it take for a government to qualify to being in charge of a country? For sure the number of other governments recognizing them is not a qualifier. The US Government negotiated with the Talaban which means the US Government knew who was in charge or they would not have negotiated with them. If some entity was in charge in Afghanistan then the US Government would have negotiated with them instead. Your lack of knowledge is showing again Buck.

Posted Image

I am a free-market, pro-liberty, classical liberal.


#28 OFFLINE   buckshot

 
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:florida
  • Country::
    Member No: 202
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:26 PM

Can the Taliban sign a peace treaty or negotiate any legal binding agreements that other countries would recognize? Anything we negotiate with them are not worth the paper it was written on.

Drones and special ops are the only way we can control them, Kill their leaders and they will have no directions to further their intentions to hurt our country.
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to a better understanding of ourselves.
Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology
(1875 - 1961

#29 OFFLINE   Buddy Kidd

 

    Keeper of The Realm

  • Administrator
  • 27,629 posts
  • Skin: Steel Glass
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma City, OK
  • Country::
  • Time Online: 4d 17h 29m 21s
    Member No: 1
 

Posted 24 January 2012 - 07:42 PM

View Postbuckshot, on 24 January 2012 - 07:26 PM, said:

Can the Taliban sign a peace treaty or negotiate any legal binding agreements that other countries would recognize? Anything we negotiate with them are not worth the paper it was written on.

Drones and special ops are the only way we can control them, Kill their leaders and they will have no directions to further their intentions to hurt our country.

Who are we negotiating with if not a government?

Buck, what does it take for a government to qualify to being in charge of a country? For sure the number of other governments recognizing them is not a qualifier. The US Government negotiated with the Talaban which means the US Government knew who was in charge or they would not have negotiated with them. If some entity was in charge in Afghanistan then the US Government would have negotiated with them instead. Your lack of knowledge is showing again Buck.

Posted Image

I am a free-market, pro-liberty, classical liberal.


#30 OFFLINE   buckshot

 
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:florida
  • Country::
    Member No: 202
 

Posted 25 January 2012 - 07:14 AM

Buddy, getting back to the my original post, I think that the best way to handle the threat of the radical Islamists in Afghanistan would be to use Drones and special ops to kill their leaders, and they will have no directions to further their intentions to hurt our country, rather then having 100 thousand boots on the ground and spending billions to rebuild their country. We will never ever be able to change their ideology.
Everything that irritates us about others can lead us to a better understanding of ourselves.
Carl Jung, founder of analytical psychology
(1875 - 1961

#31 OFFLINE   Buddy Kidd

 

    Keeper of The Realm

  • Administrator
  • 27,629 posts
  • Skin: Steel Glass
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Oklahoma City, OK
  • Country::
  • Time Online: 4d 17h 29m 21s
    Member No: 1
 

Posted 25 January 2012 - 08:53 AM

View Postbuckshot, on 25 January 2012 - 07:14 AM, said:

Buddy, getting back to the my original post, I think that the best way to handle the threat of the radical Islamists in Afghanistan would be to use Drones and special ops to kill their leaders, and they will have no directions to further their intentions to hurt our country, rather then having 100 thousand boots on the ground and spending billions to rebuild their country. We will never ever be able to change their ideology.

I see that you are unable to come up with a rational answer to my questions so you try to change the subject. LOL

France Opts Not to Pull Forces From Afghan War


Opps, you got it wrong again Buck.

Posted Image

I am a free-market, pro-liberty, classical liberal.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users