Welcome to UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD
![]() |
Welcome to UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be apart of UNTO THE BREACH DISCUSSION BOARD by signing in or creating an account.
|
Guest Message by DevFuse
I thought it was against Federal law to hire illegals?
Started by Buddy Kidd, Sep 01 2010 08:55 AM
6 replies to this topic
#1 OFFLINE
Posted 01 September 2010 - 08:55 AM
Feds file new Arizona immigration lawsuit, this time to protect workers
By Daniel B. Wood
Tue Aug 31, 8:06 pm ET
Los Angeles – Less than two months after the US Department of Justice sued Arizona over the state’s controversial immigration law, it has filed another lawsuit targeting immigration practices by Arizona authorities.
The new case is unrelated to the one against Gov. Jan Brewer and the state over the illegal immigration law, but that doesn't mean it won't be a divisive one. Legal experts say it further sets up a clash between the 10th Amendment – which gives to states all powers that aren't explicitly granted to the federal government – and the Supremacy Clause, which gives the federal government exclusive power over immigration.
In the new suit, filed Monday, the Justice Department says Phoenix-area Maricopa Community Colleges (MCC) discriminated against almost 250 noncitizen job applicants by requiring them to fill out more documents than the law requires to prove their eligibility to work.
Monday's suit is “stronger in a way” than the suit against Governor Brewer over the immigration law, because it is more specific, says Jesse Choper of UC Berkeley’s Boalt School of Law.
Congress has stated what it requires for the employment application, “but doesn’t say what states cannot require,” says Mr. Choper. “If the federal government named the requirements and said these are the only ones, this case would be a slam dunk,” he says. “But they didn’t, so now the government has to argue what they intended.”
It’s “unlawful to treat authorized workers differently during the hiring process based on their citizenship status,” said Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, in a statement. The government is “acting now to remedy this pattern or practice of discrimination.”
This new lawsuit indicates that the state of Arizona continues to dominate the immigration debate in the United States, says Catherine Wilson, an immigration expert at Villanova University. “It also tells us that the Obama administration is cracking down on discriminatory hiring practices for noncitizens at the same time [it] faces intense criticism of heightened levels of deportations under its watch – higher than those under Bush.”
Representatives for Maricopa Community Colleges – which operates 10 colleges and two vocational training centers in the Phoenix area – have declined to comment on the suit. But Ms. Wilson says that there is a possibility that the MCC could settle with the government. That happened in a similar case earlier this year, when John Jay College was sued by the Justice Department for bias against noncitizens.
“They put into effect a training program to avoid further criticism of their hiring practices,” says Wilson. “The MCC training might include similarly training their personnel over what are the proper forms to use and how to see that this doesn’t happen again.”
By Daniel B. Wood
Tue Aug 31, 8:06 pm ET
Los Angeles – Less than two months after the US Department of Justice sued Arizona over the state’s controversial immigration law, it has filed another lawsuit targeting immigration practices by Arizona authorities.
The new case is unrelated to the one against Gov. Jan Brewer and the state over the illegal immigration law, but that doesn't mean it won't be a divisive one. Legal experts say it further sets up a clash between the 10th Amendment – which gives to states all powers that aren't explicitly granted to the federal government – and the Supremacy Clause, which gives the federal government exclusive power over immigration.
In the new suit, filed Monday, the Justice Department says Phoenix-area Maricopa Community Colleges (MCC) discriminated against almost 250 noncitizen job applicants by requiring them to fill out more documents than the law requires to prove their eligibility to work.
Monday's suit is “stronger in a way” than the suit against Governor Brewer over the immigration law, because it is more specific, says Jesse Choper of UC Berkeley’s Boalt School of Law.
Congress has stated what it requires for the employment application, “but doesn’t say what states cannot require,” says Mr. Choper. “If the federal government named the requirements and said these are the only ones, this case would be a slam dunk,” he says. “But they didn’t, so now the government has to argue what they intended.”
It’s “unlawful to treat authorized workers differently during the hiring process based on their citizenship status,” said Thomas Perez, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, in a statement. The government is “acting now to remedy this pattern or practice of discrimination.”
This new lawsuit indicates that the state of Arizona continues to dominate the immigration debate in the United States, says Catherine Wilson, an immigration expert at Villanova University. “It also tells us that the Obama administration is cracking down on discriminatory hiring practices for noncitizens at the same time [it] faces intense criticism of heightened levels of deportations under its watch – higher than those under Bush.”
Representatives for Maricopa Community Colleges – which operates 10 colleges and two vocational training centers in the Phoenix area – have declined to comment on the suit. But Ms. Wilson says that there is a possibility that the MCC could settle with the government. That happened in a similar case earlier this year, when John Jay College was sued by the Justice Department for bias against noncitizens.
“They put into effect a training program to avoid further criticism of their hiring practices,” says Wilson. “The MCC training might include similarly training their personnel over what are the proper forms to use and how to see that this doesn’t happen again.”
#2 OFFLINE
Posted 02 September 2010 - 01:22 AM
When will this crap stop???
Everything I needed to learn about Islam, I learned on 9/11
#3 OFFLINE
Posted 02 September 2010 - 11:49 AM
January 20, 2013.
I am straight, white, male and conservative. Now what else can I do to piss you off today?
#4 OFFLINE
Posted 02 September 2010 - 05:00 PM
wing, on 02 September 2010 - 11:49 AM, said:
January 20, 2013.
If a conservative majority can effectively eviscerate Obama, the middle of this coming January should already bring about the putting on the brakes on this socialist train to hell on which we currently find ourselves.
Proud Parent of an Iraqi Freedom Veteran!
"As a Declarationist, I declare unequivocally that all men are created equal. They are not gestated as possible candidates for abortion. They are no more eligible for abortion than African Americans are automatically eligible for slavery."
- Michael Moriarty
"As a Declarationist, I declare unequivocally that all men are created equal. They are not gestated as possible candidates for abortion. They are no more eligible for abortion than African Americans are automatically eligible for slavery."
- Michael Moriarty
#5 OFFLINE
Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:07 AM
...when are you people going to learn that man-made laws do not apply to a president-god?
Edited by Ghostman, 05 September 2010 - 09:08 AM.
...Obama again?? ...Really??
#6 OFFLINE
Posted 07 September 2010 - 10:52 PM
Hmmm...
Why would an illegal immigrant be granted legal standing by a court? The person is not legally qualified to apply for a job in Arizona.
Why would an illegal immigrant be granted legal standing by a court? The person is not legally qualified to apply for a job in Arizona.
Wis 1:1-4
1. Love justice, you who judge the earth; think of the LORD in goodness, and seek him in integrity of heart;
2. Because he is found by those who test him not, and he manifests himself to those who do not disbelieve him.
3. For perverse counsels separate a man from God, and his power, put to the proof, rebukes the foolhardy;
4. Because into a soul that plots evil wisdom enters not, nor dwells she in a body under debt of sin.
http://okangel.250fr...AManInHere.html
1. Love justice, you who judge the earth; think of the LORD in goodness, and seek him in integrity of heart;
2. Because he is found by those who test him not, and he manifests himself to those who do not disbelieve him.
3. For perverse counsels separate a man from God, and his power, put to the proof, rebukes the foolhardy;
4. Because into a soul that plots evil wisdom enters not, nor dwells she in a body under debt of sin.
http://okangel.250fr...AManInHere.html
#7 OFFLINE
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

















